Then start pulling words out of these stories and help the children to examine these outside of the context of the story. Try things like having the children dictate language experience stories, and do lots of reading and rereading (including choral reading) with these. Too often sight word teaching becomes a drill-sequence that is unnecessarily tedious. They also may be struggling with this teaching if they aren’t well-versed in how to do that. I think your teachers are frustrated not because they are teaching the wrong stuff, but because the standard is set too high to be practical. I would suggest a much more modest goal for the end of kindergarten (perhaps 20 words or so, with at least 10 of those being high frequency words). Typically, the first 100 high frequency aren’t mastered by most kids until Thanksgiving or so (and that is with considerable effort). I’ve always told my teachers that by the end of grade 1 the students should know all of the 100 most frequent words - and a 300-500 other easy-to-decode words as well. That sounds ambitious (which is good), but I suspect that there will be a lot of failure with it. However, 60 words sounds high to me (as does the idea that everyone will know the most frequent 100 words by Oct 1 of grade 1). Unfortunately, it isn't specific as to how many, but this authoritative guide makes it absolutely clear that sight word teaching is appropriate in kindergarten. It suggests that by the end of kindergarten, children should recognize some words by sight including a few very common ones (the, I, my, you, is, are). I’ve watched hundreds of Kindergarten teachers teaching words and have reviewed lots of research on the teaching of print to young children, and see no evidence that this cannot be done profitably and well.īased on its seminal research review (Prevention of Reading Difficulties) the National Research Council issued an implementation guide for schools, a marvelous little book, Starting Our Right: A Guide to Promoting Children’s Reading Success that I used when I was director of reading in Chicago. If it weren't developmentally appropriate, then young children simply would not learn the words (but they do). I have no qualms in saying that it IS developmentally appropriate to teach sight words to kindergarteners (or even preschoolers). However, the research is not terribly specific as to how many words should be taught or when so anything I say on that will have to come entirely from experience and the wisdom of others. Research and experience tell me that sight word instruction is helpful to young children who are learning to read. There are currently 60 high frequency words being measured/hopefully mastered by the end of K in our data books for that level.Ĭould you provide some insight about this? Specific research for me to back it - How many? Which ones? I just printed the executive summary of the report of the natl early literacy panel…yet as I skim through I see nothing regarding sight word acquisition.Īt this point, we have some that believe it’s NOT developmentally appropriate to teach sight words….others are very skills=based and driven to do so, especially with the 1st grade goal of mastery of 100 high frequency words by Oct 1 of first grade. I’m on the hunt for some solid research and have not been successful in finding it (I’m usually pretty good in doing so!) My K teachers are in disagreement about the teaching of sight vocabulary – and it’s a driving force for some angst right now in their team. I’m writing you out of sheer frustration in doing my own research on the topic of Kindergarten Sight words – perhaps it’s because the answer I’m looking for just isn’t there? However, in theīeginning it is useful to teach students to recognize some high frequency words-even by memory. Students eventually recognize almost all words as sight words. If decoding is taught well and effectively Teaching sight words directly (and not just as an outcome of phonics).īasically, sight words are words students can identify immediately with noĮvident sounding or mediation. These days theĭyslexia-focused advocates would likely fry me for supporting the idea of Sight vocabulary and I was suggesting they were overdoing it). Number of words recommended (since some of the publishers and consultants were promoting large numbers of Blast from the Past: This entry was first posted on Februand was re-issued on February 2, 2019. When this blog entry first posted the only part that was controversial was the
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |